Taro Daniel vs Renzo Olivo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L L L L
Form
W L W W L W L L W LHead To Head: Daniel 3 - 0 Olivo
They have played 7 sets in total, with Daniel winning 6 and Olivo winning 1. The last match between Daniel and Olivo was at the Szczecin Challenger, 13-09-2017, Second, Clay with Taro Daniel getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | 3 |
| Renzo Olivo | 0 |
Szczecin Challenger(13-09-2017)
7
5
7
5
| Daniel | Stats | Olivo |
|---|---|---|
| 25% (4-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (13-12) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 131 | Ranking | 359 |
| 58 | Highest Rank | 78 |
| 32 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (573-422) | Career Total W/L | 51% (468-441) |
| $2,262,594 | Career Prize Money | $517,870 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Renzo Olivo
71%
(
70 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Renzo Olivo
75%
(
82 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Renzo Olivo
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 44 | Games Won | 33 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:5:26 | Average Match Time | 2:5:26 |
| 73% (186/254) | 1st Serve % | 62% (159/256) |
| 66% (122/186) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (98/159) |
| 56% (38/68) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (43/97) |
| 48% (14/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (9/25) |
| 45% (91/202) | Return Points Win % | 40% (82/207) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Taro Daniel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Renzo Olivo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Renzo Olivo
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
9
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Hernan Casanova
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
90%
(
73 of
81)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Renzo Olivo
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Nicolas Villalon
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Renzo Olivo
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Bernard Tomic
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Max Wiskandt
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
75 of
99)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
66%
(
72 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (573/422) | Win/Loss | 51% (468/441) |
| 56% (1316/1035) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (1100/1065) |
| 52% (11475/10599) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (10361/10357) |
| 56% (203/161) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (43/58) |
| 60% (304/204) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (418/370) |
| 58% (59/42) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 32% (7/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2471 | Aces Total | 1707 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1998 | Total Double Faults | 3058 |
| 1:22:59 | Average Match Time | 1:25:59 |
| 485.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 522.36 |
| 63% (35523/56814) | 1st Serve % | 61% (33228/54155) |
| 68% (24101/35523) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21901/33228) |
| 51% (10841/21282) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9922/20927) |
| 43% (2402/5588) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2292/5476) |
| 39% (21992/56024) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21620/53650) |
| 46% (37/43) | Slam W/L | 35% (15/28) |
| 45% (36/44) | Masters W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 53% (8/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (127/122) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (57/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (230/134) | Challenger W/L | 50% (277/282) |
| 66% (133/69) | Futures W/L | 64% (110/63) |
| 59% (549/935) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (462/889) |
| 27% (13/49) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (3/15) |
| 53% (162/307) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (165/302) |
| 50% (148/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (178/335) |
| 84% (590/498) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (463/378) |
| 15% (590/91) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (463/85) |
| 18% (405/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (445/90) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
